The 2020 Election Results

A total of 137,125,484 Americans voted in the November 3, 2020, presidential election, giving President Holland the highest share of the popular vote ever recorded within the United States.

Sharing Holland's ticket, Democratic candidates triumphed in 9 of the 12 gubernatorial races, 18 of the 31 Senate contests, and 317 of the 435 elections for seats in the U.S. House. This section provides a more detailed analysis of the information provided at this article, United States presidential election, 2020 (Holland Version), including the official results of each race and the comparative strengths of the various candidates within each state and district.

National Presidential Vote
This was the total vote breakdown for the presidential election, held in all fifty states and the District of Columbia:

President Holland's total of 90,571,382 votes far exceeds the previous record of 70,436,845 votes, which he had received four years earlier. His percentage of the total popular vote-66.1 percent-was the largest any candidate received since the popular vote first came into widespread use in 1824. (He exceeded Lyndon Johnson, with 61.1 percent (1964), Franklin D. Roosevelt with 60.8 percent (1936), Richard Nixon with 60.7 percent (1972), Warren G. Harding with 60.3 percent (1920), and Bill Clinton, with 60.2 percent (1996), in terms of the popular vote). Holland's percentage of the two-party popular vote also set a record. He received 66.5 percent of the two-party popular vote, compared to 65.2 percent for Calvin Coolidge in 1924, 63.9 percent for Harding in 1920, and 62.5 percent for Roosevelt in 1936.

Holland's popular vote margin over Dickenson-46,069,352 votes-is an all-time record, easily exceeding the 21,437,467 vote margin by which Clinton defeated Bob Dole in 1996, and the 17,995,488 plurality of Richard Nixon over George McGovern in 1972. The 2020 results were even more dramatic than those of the 2016 election, when Holland defeated the Republican ticket of Romney and Ryan by a impressive 13,641,572 popular vote margin. The 2020 Holland-Holtzman ticket received 20,134,537 more votes than in 2016.

Holland set another record by carrying nineteen states by more than a million votes: California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin. In ten states and the District of Columbia, Holland defeated Dickenson by a margin of forty percentage points or more: D.C. (92.5 percent), Hawaii (80.9 percent), Vermont (78.2 percent), California (76.7 percent), Maryland (73.7 percent), New York (73.1 percent), Massachusetts (72.4 percent), Rhode Island (70.6 percent), Illinois (70.5 percent), Texas (69.5 percent), and Colorado (68.6 percent). Holland's narrowest margin was in Wyoming, where he won by 4,708 votes (50.9 percent). In all, Holland was victorious in 49 states and the District of Columbia, winning 531 of the 538 electoral votes.

Dickenson, on the other hand, won only one state and one congressional district with 7 electoral votes. His total popular vote, 44,502,030, was 12,293,243 less than the vote of 56,795,273 which Romney received in 2016. Dickenson won 32.5 percent of the total vote and 33.5 percent of the two-party vote. His biggest victory (at the electoral level) was in Nebraska's 3rd congressional district, where he won 51.1 percent of the vote. His narrowest victory was his only state win, his home state of Mississippi, where he edged Holland by 22,110 votes (50.5 percent).

Total Vote
The total Presidential vote of 137,125,484 was the largest in American history. The previous record was set in 2016, when 129,085,410 Americans voted for President. The percentage of eligible (voting age) persons voting in 2020 also increased slightly. In 2016, 58.1 percent of the 222,000,000 eligible voters voted for President; in 2020, 58.2 percent of the 235,248,000 eligible voters.

Presidential Vote by District
A measure of Dickenson's sweeping defeat was reflected in the fact that he won a majority of the vote in only 17 of the 435 congressional districts in the country. Holland, on the other hand, was victorious in 417 districts. The breakdowns:



Of the two non-Southern districts carried by Dickenson, one was in Nebraska (NE-03) and one in Kansas (KS-01). The Southern districts he carried were four in Georgia (GA-03, GA-09, GA-11, and GA-14), three in Mississippi (MS-01, MS-03, and MS-04), two each in Alabama (AL-02 and AL-04), and Tennessee (TN-01, TN-02), and one each in Oklahoma (OK-03), South Carolina (SC-03), Kentucky (KY-05), and Louisiana (LA-01). Dickenson did not carry any congressional districts in the West or Northeast.

By contrast, Romney in 2016 had carried 160 congressional districts to Holland's 275. That year's totals:

As seen above, Romney had won the majority of congressional districts in the South that year, and had managed to win at least one congressional district in forty-two of the fifty states.

In contrast to recent presidential elections, in which the Republican presidential candidate had consistently run ahead of their party's candidate for House seats, Dickenson won a greater percentage than the Republican House candidate in only 161 of the 435 House districts. Holland was the first Democratic President since Lyndon Johnson who ran ahead of most of his party's candidates. Most of the districts in which Dickenson ran stronger than the Republican House candidate were districts in which weak or unknown candidates were running on the Republican ticket.

In 2016, Romney ran ahead of GOP house candidates in 275 districts while Holland ran ahead of Democratic house candidates in 260 districts.

Finally, Holland carried 103 of the 120 districts which elected a Republican congressman, and all 315 of the districts which elected a Democratic congressman. All 17 districts carried by Dickenson elected a Republican congressman. He did not carry any Democratic congressional districts, as shown below:



Presidential Vote by County
Another measure of Dickenson's loss can be explored through counties. He won a majority (or plurality) of the vote in only 584 of the nation's 3,144 counties, independent cities, and county-equivalents. Holland, on the other hand, was victorious in 2,560 counties. The breakdowns:



As with congressional districts, there was a clear contrast with 2016. In that year, Romney had carried 1,610 counties, to Holland's 1,534. The breakdowns:

As indicated by the results above, the Northeast was Dickenson's worst region. He won only six counties in that region, all of them in Pennsylvania: Tioga, Potter, Lycoming, Snyder, Franklin, and Fulton. Holland won every county in Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey. Holland was the first presidential candidate from either party, since Calvin Coolidge in 1924, to win every single county in New England. He became the first Democrat in history to win all of New Hampshire's counties, and only the second, following Lyndon Johnson in 1964, to win every county in New York and New Jersey. Holland dominated in most of these counties, though his victories in some traditional Republican strongholds, such as Juniata and Perry Counties in Pennsylvania, were very narrow. The best Dickenson did in any northeastern county was the 52.6 percent vote share which he received in Potter County, Pennsylvania. Potter and Snyder Counties, in fact, were the only northeastern counties where he received an absolute majority; he held Tioga, Potter, Lycoming, Franklin, and Fulton with narrow pluralities. Holland won every northeastern state with more than sixty percent of the vote, breaking seventy percent in four: Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and New York.

By contrast, the South was Dickenson's best region, where he carried 325 of the region's 1,422 counties. Of the region's sixteen states, Holland won every county in just one: Delaware. He came close in Virginia, winning all but one county, and won all but two counties in Maryland. Dickenson did best, county-wise, in Georgia, where he carried 54 of the state's 159 counties. His next best state was Kentucky, where he carried 48 of the state's 120 counties. In his home state of Mississippi, the only state in the entire country that he won, he carried 34 out of 82 counties. He carried 38 counties in Alabama and Oklahoma each, 31 counties in Tennessee, 25 parishes (county-equivalents) in Louisiana, and 19 counties in West Virginia, with all but Louisiana being decided by single digits. However, Dickenson did terribly in North Carolina, Virginia, Florida, and Holland's home state of Texas, winning, besides the one county in Virginia, nine counties in North Carolina, three counties in Florida, and ten counties in Texas. Texas, in particular, weighed in as the most Democratic (Confederate) state in the region, due to Holland's extensive popularity, deriving from his years as senator and governor there. Dickenson also did poorly in South Carolina, winning just four counties, and in Arkansas, winning just eight counties, although he managed to hold Holland under 60% in both states. Holland broke sixty percent in five Southern states: Delaware, Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, and Texas, exceeding seventy percent in Maryland.

In the Midwest, Dickenson won 170 of the region's 1,055 counties. He managed to win at least one county in each state. Although Nebraska and Kansas voted decisively for Holland, Dickenson nevertheless did the best, countywise, in those two traditionally Republican states. He carried 51 counties in Kansas and 44 in Nebraska. The counties in Nebraska were sufficient for him to eke out a narrow victory in NE-03, giving him his only electoral vote in the country outside of Mississippi. Dickenson won 34 counties in Missouri, many of them traditionally Republican strongholds in the southwest and northernmost portions of the state. He carried 18 in South Dakota, 9 in Illinois, 8 in North Dakota, 6 in Ohio and Indiana each, and 2 each in Wisconsin, Iowa, and Michigan. Holland broke sixty percent in six states: Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Ohio, and Missouri, and exceeded seventy percent in Illinois.

In the West, Dickenson's second-worst region after the Northeast, he carried 75 of the region's 450 counties. He won 23 counties in Montana, 18 in Idaho, and 14 in Wyoming. He carried 10 in Utah, 6 in Washington, 3 each in Colorado and New Mexico, and 1 each in Oregon, Nevada, and Arizona. Holland won every county in California, Alaska, and Hawaii. He was the first presidential candidate from either party, since Franklin Roosevelt in 1936, to win every county in California, and the first since Johnson in 1964 to do so in Alaska. Holland broke sixty percent in six Western states: Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Washington, Oregon, and Alaska, breaking seventy percent in California, and eighty percent in Hawaii, his best state in the nation.

The 2020 election was notable in that several county streaks were broken. In the West, the most prominent streaks broken were those of Josephine County, Oregon, Ada County, Idaho, Douglas County, Nevada, and Hughes County, South Dakota. These counties voted Democratic for the first time since 1936. In the Midwest, Holland was the first Democrat ever to win Ogle County, Illinois, and broke a Republican county streak in Lee County, Illinois extending back to 1856. He was also the first Democrat ever to win Missaukee County, Michigan, and the first to win Sanilac County, Michigan since the Republican Party's foundation. Holland also broke a string of notable county streaks in Virginia, South Carolina, Texas, Florida, Pennsylvania, and New York.

In all, Holland won the majority of counties in 48 states, Dickenson in 2 (Alabama and Wyoming). Dickenson narrowly fell short, by one county, of carrying a majority in Oklahoma, and two counties short of carrying the majority in Kansas.

Presidential Vote by Demographic
Dickenson suffered the worst loss of any presidential candidate from either party in the popular vote by demographic. Holland was the first candidate since Johnson in 1964 to win every racial demographic by double digits, and the first since Ronald Reagan in 1984 to win both genders by double digits as well. 72 percent of the electorate was white in 2020; 28 percent was nonwhite. Holland won the white vote (59 percent), defeating Dickenson among this group by a wide margin of eighteen percentage points. This was the same percentage which Johnson had earned fifty-six years earlier. Although whites still weighed in as the most Republican group in the country, Holland's victory nevertheless proved a major factor in molding the election results. He won white women (61 percent) and white men (58 percent). This marked the first time since Johnson that a Democrat carried both gender sets of whites by such margins. Holland's victory cut across educational lines, as he carried a commanding 61 percent of non-college educated whites and 58 percent of college-educated whites.He also won every white age group: white voters aged

On a state-by-state basis, Holland won whites in forty-two of the fifty states and the District of Columbia. He did best among white voters in the Northeast, Upper Midwest, in Colorado, Nevada, the states of the West Coast, Alaska, Hawaii, and in his home state of Texas (where he won 62 percent of the white vote). His weakest performances were concentrated in the former Confederate states. Holland lost the white vote in Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Oklahoma. Each of those states (except for Mississippi), were carried thanks to nonwhite (especially black) voters and a white minority (millennials, college graduates, suburban voters). Nevertheless, he lost white voters only very narrowly in Oklahoma and Arkansas; got more than forty percent among them in South Carolina, Louisiana, and Tennessee; and more than thirty percent in Georgia and Alabama. He also obtained a quarter of the white vote in Mississippi, falling just short of the percentage needed to carry the state. Of the remaining Southern states, Holland won a narrow majority among whites in Kentucky and North Carolina, carried them by a somewhat larger margin in West Virginia, and won them comfortably in Florida, Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware, in addition to Texas.

Holland did exceptionally well among minority voters, carrying each demographic by huge margins. He did best with African Americans, a fiercely Democratic voting bloc (96 percent), and posted record performances with Hispanics (76 percent), Asians (73 percent), and Other voters (60 percent). Holland won 84 percent of the overall nonwhite vote, the highest percentage won by a Democrat to date. He carried nonwhite voters in every state. As with white voters, Holland's victory carried across educational lines, as he carried 93 percent of non-college educated nonwhites and 84 percent of college-educated nonwhites. It also carried across gender lines, as he won minority women by crushing margins: black women (99 percent), Hispanic women (81 percent), and Asian/Other women (66 percent). He also dominated among minority men by significant margins: black men (90 percent), Hispanic men (70 percent), and Asian/Other men (61 percent). Holland's coalition of voters, as it had been in 2016, remained more diverse than that of his Republican counterpart, with whites comprising 62 percent of his voters, African-Americans 19 percent, Hispanics 13 percent, and Asians/Others 6 percent. Dickenson's coalition, by contrast, was 85 percent white, 2 percent African-American, 8 percent Hispanic, and 5 percent Asian/Others.

Holland won by significant margins among both genders, carrying women (71 percent) and men (64 percent). The persistent gender gap, which had first developed in the 1980s, remained in this election. Dickenson was crushed among women, losing them by 42 percentage points. He lost among men by a smaller margin-28 percentage points-but became the first Republican since Barry Goldwater to lose men by double digits. The President's dominance cut across religious barriers as well. His best group was Other voters (89 percent), followed closely by Agnostics/Atheists (85 percent), Jews (84 percent), and Muslims (80 percent). He won Catholics by 32 points (67 percent), posting the best Democratic performance among them since Lyndon Johnson in 1964. He won Protestants (58 percent) and non-denominational Christians (61 percent) by smaller but still commanding margins. And he became the first Democrat since Johnson to win Mormons (54 percent), capitalizing on their unique distaste with Dickenson's social and foreign policy views. This was critical to his victory in Utah.

Holland swept every age group in the country by double-digit margins. His best group were voters aged 18-29 (75 percent), the most Democratic age group in the electorate. His next best group were voters aged 30-39 (70 percent), receiving a higher share than he did nationally among them. He carried the next three age groups, which are more Republican-leaning, with smaller but still decisive margins: voters aged 40-49 (63 percent), voters aged 50-64 (62 percent), and voters aged 65 and older (59 percent). Younger voters were repelled by Dickenson's social and racial views; middle-aged voters by his economic ones, particularly federal agencies, healthcare, and federal subsidies; and elderly voters by his positions on such important programs as Medicaid, Medicare, pensions, and Social Security. Voters of all ages were also repelled by Dickenson's hard-line rhetoric, including his call for withdrawal from the UN and for aggressive bombing campaigns in the Middle East as well as East Asia.

Holland also won every age group by race. Among whites, he earned these percentages: whites aged 18-29 (64 percent), whites aged 30-39 (58 percent), whites aged 40-49 (58 percent), whites aged 50-64 (58 percent), and whites aged 65 and over (54 percent). Among blacks, he earned these percentages: blacks aged 18-29 (94 percent), blacks aged 30-39 (97 percent), blacks aged 40-49 (97 percent), blacks aged 50-64 (96 percent), and blacks aged 65 and over (96 percent). Among Hispanics, he earned: Hispanics aged 18-29 (79 percent), Hispanics aged 30-39 (76 percent), Hispanics aged 40-49 (76 percent), Hispanics aged 50-64 (73 percent), and Hispanics aged 65 and over (70 percent). The President received 67 percent among Asian/Other voters, as classified by age group.

By educational level, Holland also performed very well. His best group was voters without a high school education (79 percent), the most impoverished segment of the electorate. His next best group, ironically, was voters with postgraduate degrees (70 percent), who had long been gravitating to the Democratic Party. He performed exceptionally well with high school graduates (66 percent), matching his national share among them. He won college graduates, the most Republican-leaning category, by a significant margin (62 percent) and carried those with some college education with an even more decisive majority (64 percent). He won every income group as well: those making less than $30,000 (78 percent), those making between $30,000 and $49,999 (72 percent), those making between $50,000 and $99,999 (61 percent), those making between $100,000 and $199,999 (59 percent), those making between $200,000 and $249,999 (62 percent), and those making over $250,000 (57 percent).

The President's victory also carried across region. He annihilated Dickenson in urban areas (76 percent), sweeping all of the country's major cities, including the capital city of each state, and earning record percentages across the board. In Democratic strongholds, fueled by strong support from the traditional Democratic voting blocks, his commanding majority among independents, and defections of Republican voters, Holland outdistanced his opponent by significant margins: Baltimore (97 percent), Philadelphia (94 percent), Denver (90 percent), St. Louis (87 percent), New York City (88 percent), Los Angeles (84 percent), Detroit (84 percent), Austin (83 percent), Boston (83 percent), Portland (83 percent), Chicago (82 percent), Cleveland (80 percent), Seattle (80 percent), Indianapolis (78 percent), Gary (78 percent), Milwaukee (77 percent), Atlanta (76 percent), Pittsburgh (74 percent), the Twin Cities (73 percent), Columbia (71 percent), Orlando (70 percent), Kansas City (70 percent), Las Vegas (70 percent), San Antonio (70 percent), Miami (69 percent), Houston (68 percent), Nashville (66 percent), and Dallas (64 percent). Holland also broke into normally Republican strongholds, carrying Columbus (68 percent), Birmingham (67 percent), Salt Lake City (65 percent), Cincinnati (59 percent), Jacksonville (59 percent), Phoenix (57 percent), and Oklahoma City (56 percent), among others.

A similar pattern was seen in suburbs, where the President won by a commanding margin (63 percent). He dominated traditionally Democratic suburban regions, such as those of Chicago, Cleveland, Boston, Newark, San Francisco, Denver, the Twin Cities, and New York City, but also carried the traditionally Republican suburbs of Indianapolis (Hendricks, Hamilton, Boone, and Hancock Counties), Phoenix, Dallas (Denton, Collin, and Tarrant Counties), Atlanta (Cobb, Gwinnett, Henry, Douglas, and Rockdale Counties), Charleston, Philadelphia (Chester, Montgomery, Delaware, and Bucks Counties), and Kansas City, Kansas (Johnson County). His success also extended into towns (57 percent) and into rural areas (58 percent), showing a particularly marked dominance in the Northeast, Midwest, North Carolina, Florida, New Mexico, and his home state of Texas. Holland also won decisively in every region of the country, carrying the Northeast (71 percent), West (69 percent), Midwest (65 percent), and South (62 percent) by double-digit margins.

Party Strength
The Holland sweep helped the Democrats achieve their greatest Congressional majorities in 83 years, since the convening of the 75th Congress in January 1937. They scored net gains of five seats in the Senate and 37 seats in the House of Representatives, making the new Senate party breakdown 66-34 in their favor and the new House breakdown 315-120 in their favor. The 2020 election brought Democratic gains and Republican losses in every region of the country, except for Republican gains in Minnesota, West Virginia, Arkansas, and Florida. The membership of the Houses in January 2021 is shown as below:





Democrats defeated the following Republicans in the House:


 * 1) Martha McSally (AZ-02)
 * 2) Jeff Denham (CA-10)
 * 3) David Valadao (CA-21)
 * 4) Steve Knight (CA-25)
 * 5) Edward Royce (CA-39)
 * 6) Mimi Walters (CA-45)
 * 7) Dana Rohrabacher (CA-48)
 * 8) Darrell Issa (CA-49)
 * 9) Duncan Hunter (CA-50)
 * 10) Mike Coffman (CO-06)
 * 11) Gus Bilirakis (FL-12)
 * 12) Carlos Curbelo (FL-26)
 * 13) Karen Handel (GA-06)
 * 14) Austin Scott (GA-08)
 * 15) Peter Roskam (IL-06)
 * 16) Brett Guthrie (KY-02)
 * 17) Vicky Hartzler (MO-04)
 * 18) Erik Paulsen (MN-03)
 * 19) Greg Gianforte (MT-AL)
 * 20) Jeff Fortenberry (NE-01)
 * 21) Tom Kean (NJ-05)
 * 22) Leonard Lance (NJ-07)
 * 23) Rodney Freylinghuysen (NY-11)
 * 24) Lee Zeldin (NY-01)
 * 25) John Faso (NY-19)
 * 26) Claudia Tenney (NY-22)
 * 27) John Katko (NY-24)
 * 28) Steve Russell (OK-05)
 * 29) Ryan Costello (PA-06)
 * 30) Pat Meehan (PA-07)
 * 31) Trey Gowdy (SC-04)
 * 32) Will Hurd (TX-23)
 * 33) Pete Sessions (TX-32)
 * 34) Tom Garrett (VA-05)
 * 35) Barbara Comstock (VA-10)

Democrats also gained two open seats:


 * 1) PA-15 (retiring Republican incumbent Charlie Dent)
 * 2) WA-05 (retiring Republican incumbent Dave Reichert)

Republicans gained four seats, defeating these incumbents:


 * 1) Mike Ross (AR-04)
 * 2) Dan Webster (FL-11)
 * 3) Timothy Walz (MN-01)
 * 4) Bob Wise (WV-02)

In the Senate, Democrats defeated five incumbents:


 * 1) Dan Sullivan (R-AK)
 * 2) Cory Gardner (R-CO)
 * 3) David Perdue (R-GA)
 * 4) Steve Daines (R-MT)
 * 5) Thom Tillis (R-NC)

They also gained a open seat in Maine (retiring Republican incumbent Susan Collins).

Republicans picked up one seat, defeating:


 * 1) Natalie Tennant (D-WV)

On the gubernatorial level, the Republicans scored a gain in New Hampshire but lost the governorships of Missouri and Indiana. The result: a net gain of one for the Democratic Party. Holland outperformed the Democratic gubernatorial candidates in every state except for North Carolina.

Marginal Seats
Of the eighteen Democratic senators elected in 2020, five were elected with less than 55 percent of the vote. The closest win was registered by Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska), who was elected by just 318 votes (49.5 percent). Other marginal winners included Sens. Crisanta Duran of Colorado (50.3 percent), Steve Bullock of Montana (51.8 percent), Joshua Stein of North Carolina (52.6 percent), and Jason Carter of Georgia (54.6 percent), all of whom were carried to victory on Holland's coattails. Four other Democratic senators, Chellie Pingree of Maine (55.8 percent), Beto O'Rourke of Texas (56.6 percent), Jeff Merkley of Oregon (59.9 percent), and Mark Warner of Virginia (61.1 percent), also underperformed Holland. The remaining Democratic senators outperformed Holland, most notably Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan (75.5 percent), and one, Jack Reed of Rhode Island, ran completely unopposed.

Of the thirteen Republican senators elected in 2020, five were elected with less than 55 percent of the vote. The closest win on the Republican side was registered by Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina (50.2 percent). Other marginal winners included Sens. Joni Ernst of Iowa (50.8 percent), Mitch McConnell of Kentucky (51.4 percent), Ben Sasse of Nebraska (52.5 percent), and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana (53.6 percent). Holland outperformed these five, carrying all but Kentucky by double-digit margins. One other Republican senator, Tom Cotton of Arkansas (55.7 percent), also underperformed Holland, who won the state with 56.1 percent. The remaining Republican senators ran ahead of Holland, including the sole Republican pickup, Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia (58.8 percent), and Steven Palazzo of Mississippi (59.0 percent), the only senator elected from a state Holland lost. One Republican senator, Mike Enzi of Wyoming, ran completely unopposed, while Jim Risch of Idaho (66.5 percent), performed the best of those Republican senators with competition.

In the House, 61 Democrats and 49 Republicans were elected by less than 55 percent of the vote. Four Republicans had the closest calls, winning their races by a plurality of the votes cast. Each of their districts were carried by Holland by significant margins at the presidential level. These were Mike Bishop of Michigan (49.1 percent), Adam Kinzinger of Illinois (49.5 percent), Bruce Poliquin of Maine (49.8 percent), and Marc Amodei of Nevada (49.9 percent). Two others, Elise Stefanik of New York (50.0 percent) and Paul Cook of California (50.1 percent), won reelection with a narrow majority of the popular votes cast. Of the thirty-five Republicans defeated for reelection, the one who lost by the largest margin was Steve Knight of California (35.4 percent); the one who suffered the most narrow defeat was Martha McSally of Arizona (49.2 percent). Of the four Democrats who lost reelection, the one who lost by the largest margin was Bob Wise of West Virginia (39.9 percent); the one who suffered the most narrow defeat was Timothy Walz of Minnesota (49.7 percent). Each of these Democrats lost due to personal scandals, with Wise and Walz having been accused of sexual misconduct and cronyism.

Of the 9 Democratic Governors elected, 2 were elected by less than 55 percent of the vote. The closest win was registered by Gov. Jim Justice of West Virginia (50.1 percent), while the other marginal winner was Gov. John R. Gregg of Indiana (50.5 percent). The largest win was registered by Gov. Roy Cooper of North Carolina (69.1 percent), the only Democratic Governor to outperform Holland.

Of the 3 Republican Governors elected, 1, Gov. Chris Sununu of New Hampshire, won with less than 55 percent of the vote (51.1 percent), winning even as Holland carried the state by a landslide margin. The Republican Governors of North Dakota and Utah both outperformed Holland, with the largest margin being registered by Gov. Doug Burgum of North Dakota (77.1 percent), who outperformed Dickenson by a whopping 35.22 percentage points.