Talk:ZOMG!

Well,I have an idea on the structure.Praps seamless transitions can go on with internet based discussions being done with slang(even narration)and actualness being done formalUser:Serprex 20:54, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Hah! I liked The Matrix because of the Cyberpunk undertones and nifty SFX, but I, too, cringed everytime they mentioned how humans would be good batteries. I read somewhere a theory that explained the thing better: the machines were actually following their programmation, in other words they were serving humanity. Which makes sense. Who would like living in that hellhole that was Zion when they could live safely within the Matrix?

But now that that is out of the way...give me somewhere to start, or I can't help you much. --Nonimportant 16:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I mean, I know runner as a messenger or a smuggler, at most, and I'm not sure which one would fit in the neXus. --Nonimportant 21:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Well,in that narration it would be refered to as haxor,but if you have a terminology then by all means,I'm for it most probably.And haxors wouldn't just be with neXus,but also infiltrating into private servers and allUser:Serprex 22:56, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Then I'm confused, what does "She held his livings free of hackers, only targeted by runners" mean? And, by the way, what about having Elzm company being hacked, and she hiring a hacker to find the culprit? --Nonimportant 16:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

True,by being free tis improbable of some raid going on to hack into a private server,unlike neXusUser:Serprex 19:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Plot idea: Elzm's company or whatever gets hacked, the hacker stole some very important file, the security supervisor of her private network tries to find the culprit, and, in doing so, discover some greater plot, or something of the kind, then we follow Elzm doing things in the real world, and the security guy doing things in the virtual one. We only need to fill in the blanks. Unless you have a better idea, which would be great. --Nonimportant 16:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Great stories have a simple plot with intricate details.That idea works fineUser:Serprex 17:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Question: Is he in the neXus or in the real world? We never got around to describing the neXus reality, so I don't know if that's it. Veiled threat: If you don't tell me, I'll be forced to act on my current and inaccurate intel. --Nonimportant 01:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Real world,breaking in to access a RootAccess terminal.It also isn't the neXus he is breaking into,tis the private server.And the teky setting has the weirdo lingo,like haxor instead of hacker(As to how it sounds besides the jarbled English,well...we'll see now won't we?)User:Serprex 01:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Hmz...I do hope the console commands don't get unorganized.Any ideas on how to standardize it logically?Here is how I figured the setup(We can have these case insensitive,that way different hackers can have different styles)Anyways,tis a large list and it dun look good when formatted.So ima leave in source instead of using nowiki,k?User:Serprex 16:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

I find it kinda weird that the server respond with a k, but apart from that, seems good. Though the search thing should have / for or, since it's more used common, and double quotes to search whole sentences. And I'm not sure what you meant by "xor". Also, is this "Could of" a Canadian dialect thing, something English that I never heard about or is it just plain wrong? Just in case you write it in the story. --Nonimportant 16:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

XOR is a computer word for exclusive or,which means either but not both.Like you can have the chocolate xor the cookie,as saying you can have the chocolate or the cookie actually means you could have both.But anyways,I'm fully open to changing K...ideas?(I'm confused by could of,if you are noting my use of eh,well...)And / is a much better ideaUser:Serprex 16:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

"Could of" is something you use, but I've never heard of it in any of my English classes, so I assume that it's a Canadian thing. But it could be something wrong, like the mistake of using "their" and "they're" wrongly that I can't understand how English speaking people commit. I changed it to "Done. Next?" which I find kinda cool, and you? --Nonimportant 16:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

...I meant xctly what could of means,in that it could of been called fetch,but it wasn'tUser:Serprex 16:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)