Talk:Entrevista con un psicoanalista/1

Greetings Davichito,

Your Spanish writing is quite intriguing. The widespread use of expository develops backstory very rapidly, while the discussion between the journalists builds up considerable suspense about what the interview would be like. I liked how the two journalists showed their apprehension about the interview, considering Silas as a toughie who would not like to be contested on the validity of his claim to fame.

The main problem I have in the first part seems to be that the continuous expository starts to get a bit dense after a while. Indeed, considering how the focus of the story is on an interview, it is quite feasible to incorporate some of that - such as Silas's contribution to the field and the debate over his theses' originality - into the actual interview. Oftentimes journalists have considerable amounts of background information in what they write anyway, providing their own backstory; oftentimes they ask their interviewees novice questions - in this case, "what theories do you think are the most important ones you have developed so far in the field of classical psychology?" etc.

Cheers, 01:22, 4 April 2008 (UTC)