Can I go home now?

''User:Serprex 05:29, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

I don't know, can you? / What kind of an answer is that? / Socratic

Cue grabbing this patronizing bastard by the face and plowing him into a wall. There is no stupid punchline like "Why are you being plowed into this wall?" because if you asked that he'd still be a smart ass and say "Because my face was grabbed and plowed into a wall. My body tends to follow my face. It does this because it is connected by my neck. If I didn't have a neck, there'd be trouble getting oxygen to my body, and a lack of blood returning to my brain. This is because..."

Okay. I hate Socrates. Okay? Man thought people couldn't think about what they read. Like they think when they're listening. Sheesh. There's a simple solution: Never trust anything you read. Like if you see an ad in the paper saying that a free vacation can be won in exchange for accepting an experimental vaccination. First, the word free: tanstaafl. But that was handled rather quickly: free as in money, since they'd rather give you this ambiguous vacation than liquidity. Now here's the issue: the ease with which writing can be pried apart is an exponential issue, and overloads the critic. Find Ariadne's thread and continue. Do not stray. If someone offers you something of value instead of money equal to that value, there is a producer making profit. Some inefficiency, which they're sharding off for you. Be weary and beware, as inefficiencies tend to grow when a system begins to decay. Ambiguity will more probably resolve in the less desirable possibilities where inefficiencies are being sharded. Hence that vacation turns out to be to places nobody would ever vacation

Ex ante. I'll snip your thread now and say it's for the best. If only I'd had someone do so for me, perhaps I wouldn't have accepted the vaccination and hallucinated on a boat in international waters that wasn't there for the wonderful scuba diving such places can offer, but for evasion of laws regarding testing highly experimental vaccinations on people. That said, I will mention that the scuba diving was rather lovely, and I regret having agreed to not bring my camera on this vacation

It's important here to note my use of the word Man in calling out Socrates. There seems to be this idea that the intelligent men in this world were lonely visionaries who went out and taught their lesser brothers how to think. That they were of the purest altruism, the desire to grant to others one's own virtues. It's important in what follows, and how what follows relates to what I'm to ask later, though already have earlier in this recount

Where am I? / You're on a boat / Where's the sky? / You're in a boat / Below sea level? / How big do you think this boat is? / I just asked where I am / You're in a boat recovering from an experimental vaccination. I'm going to ask you some questions about how you're feeling / I'm not feeling like answering questions / Yes, well, we have medication for that

I'll save you the gory details of my vallant refusal, though you might want to remember that I'm in a rather delirius state. Also my arm was asleep. My good one. Everything gets a bit blurry after that. The medication they gave wasn't a truth serum in so far as I lied throughout their questioning. The results of the survey surprised them. I figured that out by their eyes, hesitant, but less hesitant than their voices. I should mention here that I'm using the word they in its ambiguous singular form, which I'm left to use since I never was able to identify their gender

I'm going to help you / What why how now? / Your results were very surprising, so that I believe that I can help you / I asked how / Ettiquette on a dish, or of a dish? / What? / Grammar for lunch, or dinner? / I'd rather you not demonstrate your method, especially if this is your method / Oh? / ... / Very strange. Most people take advantage of being invited to further explain themselves. You failed to exploit my equivalent of losing a tempo